Our Illumina MiSeq can now do 2 X 250 bp paired-end reads.
We are going to use an amplicon method for a simple genotyping assay to
identify very rare mutations at a single SNP site. The idea is to
amplify a short fragment (less than 300-400 bp) so the F and Rev reads
overlap by 50 or 100 bp, not just by a few bp, as we have done in some
other assays (such as 16S metagenomics), and put our target SNP in the
center of the overlap region. In this way, the SNP will be located in a
high quality region of both reads, and we can get the maximum accuracy
in the genotype call.
One problem with using the MiSeq for amplicon assays is that
it is very sensitive to the base-pair composition at each cycle.
Illumina tech support insists that a spike-in of 50% Phix DNA is
necessary for any amplicon assay. (Our Genomics lab tried it with 40%
added Phix and got poor results.) However, with the latest upgrades,
the MiSeq is now producing 15 Million reads per run, so with the 50%
Phix spike-in, it still produces over 7 M usable (high-quality) reads.
In the past, we have not used Illumina to test for
rare mutations (ultra-deep sequencing) because the overall error rate is
in the 0.3-0.5 range. Even if we restrict results to bases >Q30 at
our target, we can't find mutations with a certainty below the error
frequency of about 1 per thousand - since that would be the expected
rate of false positives. With overlapping high quality reads, we can
recalculate a new Q-score based on both reads (assuming that they both
agree on a variant call). I am still thinking about the proper math for
this (a joint probability of error), but it is something similar to the
sum of the two Q-scores (product of the two error frequencies). This
would allow us to find mutations in the one per ten thousand (or even
hundred thousand) range with a low false positive rate. The PANDA-seq
program uses similar math to calculate Q-scores for overlapping
regions, so we are going to use that for the first pass on this data.
O-MAPping the cell for a spatial understanding of basic biology
-
Mapping is crucial in understanding and contextualizing our environments.
Mapping serves many purposes – it helps us establish efficient paths
between dest...
1 day ago
25 comments:
It might be a silly question, but what about quality, that drops down towards the end of the read?
That's why we want to use long reads on a short amplicon, so they overlap a lot and we don't have to use the sequence at the ends of the read. I will post some overlapped and joined reads with adjusted Q-scores when we get them.
"Illumina tech support insists that a spike-in of 50% Phix DNA is necessary for any amplicon assay"
Where did you read this information? Is this statement true only for Nextera or every amplicon assay?
This was told to me directly on the phone by two different Illumina support specialists (MiSeq operations and Sample Prep).
PhiX is needed nomore!
Illumina's latest RTA works equally well on a single amplicon with no PhiX as 20 amplicons and 50% PhiX. Our first test using the new RTA is running now!
Our MiSeq past this test running MCS2.2 and RTA 1.17.
Very good quality for low diversity libraries with only 2% Phi-X in a 2x151 PE run.
Hurry for Illumina.
Unfortunately they do not plan to introduce the new RTA algorithm into the HiSeq RTA. So a control lane remains necessary...
Great post! I would be very interested in what you come up with to update quality scores based on the overlapping reads.
We have been working on some of these exact problems with our MiSeq 16S amplicon sequencing. We developed a method of frameshifted primers that requires no PhiX, and it should be extendable to the HiSeq platform. We also have a new method which we call molecule tagging that can reduce amplicon error rates down to ~0.42 ept.
I am working on a website that explains these processes in greater detail and provides the necessary bioinformatic tools (https://sites.google.com/site/moleculetagtoolbox/description). It is still a work in progress and will be until our paper gets accepted (which should be very soon).
Thanks for that comment Scott. I will look at the website. We are running the MiSeq with the long overlaps this week. I will have data on quality scores next week.
we had a high AR result for FLT-ITD mut. in AML shall we proceed with direct sequencing or NGS & will your technique with large overlaps be better for clarifying the sequence
Hi Scott,
Is your molecule tagging like the Veritag method from Population Genetics (http://www.populationgenetics.com/technology/veritag/) or the SAFE-Seq method (http://www.pnas.org/content/108/23/9530) or the Duplex Sequencing approach (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22853953)? It would be nice to see one of these ported to the MiSeq.
Thanks for contributing those links! I had not seen them before. Yes, we are essentially doing the SafeSeq method on the MiSeq. It seems like the duplex tagging is a great idea too.
Dr. Brown:
When you said "Our Genomics lab tried it with 40% added Phix and got poor results.". Would tell a little detail why you think the results are poor?
We just did a MiSeq 2x150 amplicon run with the new software and an extremely small PhiX spike-in and it has effectively doubled our yield! It's great to see the technology continually improving; we're now getting almost 10 times as many reads from each 2x150 MiSeq run as we did just a few months back.
http://yeastinfection7.com/
Hi Scott,
Curious to hear about what % PhiX you are using now for Amplicon-Seq. Have you tried a staggered primer approach?
Hi Genohub,
Yes, we use the staggered primer approach, and because of that we don't need any PhiX. However, I have heard that with the most recent MiSeq upgrades only ~2% PhiX is needed to get high quality sequences.
Hi,
Scott and my paper describing MiSeq paired-end sequencing methods with frameshifting primers for great quality without phiX and molecule tags for correcting errors/bias will be coming out online in Nature Methods Sept. 1st. Look for this and also check out a paper by Jeremiah Faith / Jeff Gordon which describes some very similar techniques (they call their LEA-seq) and was published this July in the journal Science. Scott wrote some user-friendly software (optional GUI) that can process paired end reads from either of these and related techniques.
Seems interesting-
PEAR: A fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR
http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/10/18/bioinformatics.btt593.short
Do you have experience in SNP discovery using MiSeq with polyploid organisms?
Hi Scott Yourstone,
Since you use the staggered primer approach, how do you design the Index sequencing primer (and reverse compliment Read 2) since there is variable number of bases between the reverse primer/linker?
Thanks for any insight.
Hi Yev,
The framshifted molecule tagged primers include an Illumina adapter (which I think is the same thing as the index primer). So when those primers are designed they look something like:
[Illumina index primer] [molecule tag with frameshifts] [spacer] [target primer]
After all PCR steps the index can be added using the index primer.
[url=http://albertaland4sale.com/author/stevenlut-stevenlut/]http://albertaland4sale.com/author/stevenlut-stevenlut/[/url]
Транспортно-логистическая компания "Азия-Трейдинг" - это специализированный таможенный агент, деятельность которого осуществляется в зоне действия Владивостокской и Находкинской таможни и основным направлением компании является организация таможенного оформления импортных грузов.
Great post! I would be very interested in what you come up with to update quality scores based on the overlapping reads.
RNA Sequencing
Single Cell RNA Sequencing
Protein Stabilization
I really want to thank Dr Emu for saving my marriage. My wife really treated me badly and left home for almost 3 month this got me sick and confused. Then I told my friend about how my wife has changed towards me. Then she told me to contact Dr Emu that he will help me bring back my wife and change her back to a good woman. I never believed in all this but I gave it a try. Dr Emu casted a spell of return of love on her, and my wife came back home for forgiveness and today we are happy again. If you are going through any relationship stress or you want back your Ex or Divorce husband you can contact his whats app +2347012841542 or email emutemple@gmail.com website: Https://emutemple.wordpress.com/
Post a Comment